2006 TVR Tuscan S convertible
|  | 
| tvr tuscan convertible in red | 
|  | 
| tvr tuscan convertible side view | 
tvr tuscan convertible
            Five different inline six engine options were offered to  customers. Four of these were variants of the 4.0 L Speed Six making  different amounts of power and torque, depending on the trim level  selected. The last was a 3.6 L Speed Six which produced the same amount  of power as the lowest-level 4.0 L engine, although slightly less  torque.
Bore and stroke: 96 mm by 92 mm (4.0 L) or 96 mm by 83 mm (3.6 L)
Power and torque:
          TVR Tuscan: 360 hp (268.5 kW), 310 ft.lbf (420.3 Nm)
          TVR Tuscan Red Rose: 380 hp (283.4 kW), 310 ft.lbf (420.3 Nm)
          TVR Tuscan S (pre-2003): 390 hp (290.8 kW), 310 ft.lbf (420.3 Nm)
          TVR Tuscan S (post-2003): 400 hp (298.3 kW), 315 ft.lbf (427.1 Nm)
          3.6 L: 350 hp (261 kW), 290 ft.lbf (393.2 Nm)
|  | 
| tvr tuscan convertible interior | 
Chassis
          Even though there have been numerous tweaks to the TVR Tuscan's chassis  and suspension, the overall size and appearance of the variants remain  virtually identical apart from minor aerodynamic aids to the S model in  the form of an undertray in the front and a small boot-lid spoiler on  the rear.
          In October 2005 the "Mk 2" version of the TVR Tuscan was  introduced, though in reality this was just a minor facelift. The  modifications were restricted to cosmetic changes to the front and rear  lights, the dashboard, and the spoilers on the S model plus some minor  changes to the chassis to improve the handling. At the same time, a new  variant a full soft top was introduced alongside the original targa  version.
|  | 
| tvr tuscan convertible front view | 
|  | 
| tvr tuscan convertible back view | 
Performance
• 0-30 mph: 1.73 s
• 0-60 mph: 3.68 s
• 0-100 mph: 8.08 s
• 100-0 mph: 4.15 s
It  is worth noting that these test results were achieved in a post-2003  TVR Tuscan S without traction-control or anti-lock brakes. TVR's design  philosophy holds that such features do not improve either the  performance or safety of their vehicles and thus they are not so  equipped. TVR rejects the notion that these features, along with  airbags, are "safety devices" and believes that, based on testing and  experience.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.jpg) 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment